P/E needs profits. EV/EBITDA needs positive operating earnings. Plenty of fast-growing companies have neither yet — so the multiple that’s left is the one measured against sales.
When earnings multiples break
For a company losing money, P/E is either blank or meaningless (a negative or absurd number), and EV/EBITDA fails too if operating earnings are negative. That’s common for young, high-growth businesses pouring everything into expansion. You can’t value them on profits that don’t exist yet — so you step up the income statement to the one line that’s reliably positive: revenue.
EV/Revenue and price-to-sales
EV/Revenue divides enterprise value (market cap plus net debt) by annual sales — the whole business priced against its top line. Price-to-sales is the simpler cousin, using just market cap. Either way you’re asking: how many years of current revenue is the market paying for this company?
What a high sales multiple bakes in
A rich revenue multiple is a bet on the future: that today’s fast-growing, unprofitable sales will keep compounding and eventually convert to healthy profits. At 20× sales, the market is pricing in years of exactly that. It says nothing about whether the profits actually arrive — which is the whole risk.
A sales multiple only means something next to the margin it’s expected to produce. Revenue you can’t turn into profit isn’t worth much.
The margin trap
This is the pitfall: a low sales multiple isn’t automatically cheap. A grocer trading at ~1× sales is priced that way because it keeps only pennies of profit per dollar of revenue — on earnings it can still be expensive. Only compare revenue multiples within similar business models, and always read them against the margins the company earns (or is expected to).
With no profits, Snowflake has no meaningful P/E — so EV/Revenue carries the valuation. At roughly 20× sales the market is paying for years of rapid, eventually-high-margin growth to arrive. Contrast a thin-margin retailer near 1.3× sales: that low multiple isn’t ‘cheap,’ it just reflects pennies of profit per sales dollar. A revenue multiple only makes sense beside the margins it’s meant to become.
Educational commentary — not adviceEV/Revenue and the margin are computed from the filings; the read explains why the sales multiple is the right tool here — and why it can’t be judged without the margin beside it. (Example reading — a point-in-time snapshot, not current data.)
Takeaways
- When there are no profits, earnings multiples break — value against sales instead.
- EV/Revenue prices the whole business against its top line (price-to-sales uses market cap).
- A high sales multiple bakes in future growth and future margins — a bet, not a fact.
- A low sales multiple isn’t automatically cheap — thin margins earn low multiples.
See the right multiple for the company
Pull up any ticker and get EV/Revenue alongside the earnings multiples and margins, with a plain-language read of which one actually fits.
Launch app →Roos Research provides educational information and commentary only and does not offer financial, investment, or trading advice. Markets carry risk; do your own research.